Select Page

Colombianite

Colombianite For Sale!
Here at Majestic Quartz, we have full time staff based in Colombia searching for the very best specimens to bring to you the customer! Our Colombianites are top grade and very, very competitively priced. This is how our prices are lower than other shops – we cut out all the middlemen!

As with many crystal families there is a fair amount of misinformation out there. One such misconception is that Colombianite is a pseudo Tektite that is a form of Obsidian. This is incorrect, Colombianite is indeed a Tektite in it’s own right. For further science based information, scroll to the bottom of this page.
The Colombianite for sale at here at Majestic Quartz is extremely high quality. Purchase with confidence knowing that your specimen will be among the best of the best ever found.

Showing all 10 results

Products 1 - 10 from 10. Products on page

Lunar and Planetary Science XLVIII (2017)

PLIOCENE IMPACT CRATER DISCOVERED IN COLOMBIA: GEOLOGICAL EVIDENCES FROM TEKTITES.

A. Ocampo1, J. Gómez2, J. A. García3, A. Lindh4, A. Scherstén4, A. Pitzsch5, L. Page4, A. Ishikawa6, K. Suzuki7, R. S. Hori8, Margarita Buitrago9 and José Abel Flores9, D. Barrero10 , V. Vajda11; 1NASA HQ, Science Mission Directorate, US (aco@nasa.gov), 2Colombian Geological Survey, Bogotá, Colombia; 3Universidad Libre, Sociedad astronomica ANTARES, Cali, Colombia; 4Department of Geology, Lund University, Sweden; 5MAX–lab, Lund University, Sweden/ Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin, Institute Methods and Instrumentation for Synchrotron Radiation Research, Berlin, Germany; 6Department of Earth Science & Astronomy, The University of Tokyo, Japan;
7IFREE/SRRP, Japan Agency for Marine–Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan; 8Department of Earth Science, Ehime University, Japan; 9Department of Geology, University of Salamanca, Spain. 10Consultant geologist, Bogotá, Colombia; 11Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Sweden

Introduction: The geological and paleontological record have revealed that impacts of large extraterrestrial bodies may cause ecosystem devastation at a global scale [1], whereas smaller impacts have more regional consequences depending on their size, impact angle and composition of the target rocks [2]. Approximately 200 impact structures are currently confirmed on Earth and each year a small number is added to this list but only nine verified impact craters have been detected on the South American continent despite its large area [3]. Here we provide evidence of a large, buried impact crater, the Cali Crater, located in western Colombia (Fig. 1) and dated to mid-Pliocene, i.e., 3.28 ± 0.07 million years.

Methodology:We studied tektites and other impactites from the newly discovered, Pliocene Cali Crater by optical microscopy, petrography, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray analyses (EDS), major- and trace-element (including High Siderophile Elements, HSE) analyses by ICP-AES and ICP-MS respectively, 40Ar/39Ar geochronology, and Xray absorption spectroscopy [4]. We further investigated the crater by extensive geological field survey, labwork and geophysical methods including gravimetry and seismic profiling [4]. Herein we focus on the geochemical and geochronological results of our study.

The impact crater and the local geology: The Cali Crater is located in the Cauca Sub-Basin between the Western and Central Colombian Cordillera, SE of Cali, in a geologically complex and tectonically modify area Fig 2 [5]. Using seismic data we determine the outer ring of the buried Cali impact crater has major axis of 36 km and a minor axis of 26 km. The morphology, hydrology, and minerology of the region has been modified by the impact event. The Cauca river crosscuts the impact crater in a North-South direction. The target rock was composed of interbedded lithic sandstones and quartzites.

The Calitites: 550 individual tektites were collected for this work. They are associated with alluvial fan deposits along a 240 km stretch in the Cauca river valley, suggesting that they were carried down from the cordilleras [6]. The Cali crater is located in the middle of the area of tektite distribution. The tektites are ~1–15 cm, subangular with well-developed pits and some with striations and banding (Figure 1). They are composed of greenish to brownish translucent heterogeneous glass with bubbles and glassy inclusions and bubles (Figure 1), and in some cases iron particles are present [4]. The bulk composition of the tektites is 70–77 wt%
SiO2 and 13–20 wt% Al2O3. These were already described as tektites by Barnes (1958)[7], but then grouped with Peruvian tektites/obsidian of different ages and collectively called “Americanites” [8]. Locally the tektites are presently called, “Colombianites” or “piedra de rayo” (lightning stones). The tektites have
also in more recent scientific publications been called “Colombianites”, and interpreted as obsidian, volcanic glass, from the Paletará Caldera [9]. However, their age and Sr-Ca and Mn-Ti relations do not match locally formed obsidian. Due to these circumstances we avoid using these previous names and designate the tektites Calitites denoting their origin being tektites and their direct link to the Cali impact crater. As noted elsewhere [10–11], the chemical composition of tektites is strongly controlled by the composition of the target rocks. Further, the internal structure and surface, and internal texture of the Calitites support an impact origin. Thus, we strongly propose that the origin of the tektite-strewn field is related to the Cali impact.

Figure 1. Variety of Calitites
A. Tektite 1 in plain light, note pitted surface; B. Tektite 2 in transmitted light; C. Tektite 3 in plain light note heavy striation formed during impact process. This striation is persistent through the interior of the tektite. D. Tektite 3, striated area as in C now seen in thin section containing particles – mainly Fe.

Dating of the Calitites: Fragments from three tektites were dated using 40Ar/39Ar geochronology (see material and methods in Supplementary Information). These measurements yield plateau ages at 3.22 ± 0.07, 3.23 ± 0.06 and 3.29 ±0.02 Ma with a weighted mean of 3.25 ±0.04 Ma (all errors at 2􀁖 (see [4] for detailed information). The age of the Calitites correlates well to
age of the core samples recuperated from the Cali crater site.
Fig.

Fig. 2. Geological map of the Cali Crater [5]. (a) Location of the geological map area. (1) Quaternary, (1a) Alluvial deposits; (1b) Volcanoclastic deposits; (1c) Alluvial fans; (2) Upper Pliocene volcanites; (3) Miocene, (3a) Claystones, siltstones, coarse grained sandstones, conglomerates and dacitic tuffs and (3b) Intrusives; (4) Eocene–Oligocene sedimentites; (5) Paleocene intrusive; (6) Upper Cretaceous, (6a) Marine sedimentites, tuffs and agglomerate; (6b) Basalts and (6c) Gabbros and tonalites; (7) Lower Cretaceous marine sedimentitas; (8) Triassic intrusive; and (9) Permian to Cretaceous Metamorphic rocks.

Acknowledgements: We acknowledge the support from NASA Planetary Science Division (AO). The research was jointly supported by the Swedish Research Council (VR grant 2015-04264 to VV; 2008–
3447 to AS) and the Lund University Carbon Cycle Centre (LUCCI). Financial support was received through grants from the Swedish Research Council 2008–3447 (AS). We acknowledge the support of the Colombian Geological Survey (SGC) for financial support for fieldwork, especially Director Dr. Oscar
Paredes).

References: [1] Vajda, V. et al. (2015) Gondwana Research, 27, 1079–1088. [2] Morgan, J. et al. (1997) Nature 390, 472–476. [3] The Earth Impact Database http://www.passc.net/EarthImpactDatabase/index.html [4] Vajda et al. (2017) Gondwana Research in press. [5] Gómez, J. et al. (2013) Colombian Geological Survey. Bogotá. [6] Stutzer, O. (1926) Compilación de los estudiosgeológicos oficiales en Colombia 1917–1933 2, 245–255. [7] Barnes, V. E. et al. (1958) Nature 181, 1457–1458. [8] Friedman, I. et al. (1958) Science 127, 91. [9] Bellot-Gurlet, L. et al. (2008) J. Archaeolog.
Sci. 35, 272–289. [10] Osinski, G. R. et al. (2008) Meteorit. Planet. Sci. 43, 1939–1954 [11] Dressler, B.O. Reimold, W.U. (2001) Earth Sci. Rev. 56, 205–284.